Agroecology Slide Show for PS102N
The issue …
How might we feed the world in 100 or 1000 years?

A. Goals:
|
![]() |
B. The basic practices that generally characterize conventional agriculture:
The Green Revolution Norman Borlaug 1914 -
1970 Nobel Peace Prize
1. Grain production per person has begun to decline since 1980
2. Soil lost to wind and water erosion:
Africa, South America, North America 5-10 tons/ha/year Asia 30 tons/ha/year -------- Soil is created ~1 ton/ha/year 3. Estimated that half of the water applied in agriculture is not taken up by the targeted crop plants.
4. Pollution: 28 of 29 cities tested in the Midwest (US) had herbicides in their drinking water (EPA, 1995)
5. High yields have been accomplished through high inputs
6. Loss of genetic diversity: There are fewer and fewer varieties to draw upon for adaptive genes.
7. Loss of local control over agricultural production. <2% of pop. Live and work on farms in US
8. Farmer’s share of profit for crop is declining and increasingly dependent on government subsidies.
Agricultural Sustainability would at the very least:
If we conclude that we may not be able to feed the world under our current approach, how can we change our approach to accomplish our goal?
The agriculture of the future must be both sustainable and highly productive.
A more ecological approach to agriculture may improve our chances at accomplishing the goal.
Agroecology = the application of ecological concepts and principles to the design and management of sustainable agroecosystems. Implies new goals with an understanding of their relationships:
Goals:
This section further defines the conceptual basis for Agroecology and is taken from a series of papers in the Ecology journal. Ecol.(1989) 70:1590-1602
Ecology, Agroecosystems, and Sustainable Agriculture
David Coleman
Agroecology is the science of sustainable agriculture.
The necessary marriage between ecology and agriculture.
Wes Jackson and Jon Piper
| Agroecology is the study of how natural systems can be used as a template or model for developing agricultural systems. Therefore, agriculture will necessarily be composed of polycultures designed to benefit from spatial, seasonal and nutritional complementarity among species and draw largely on studies of plant interference and facilitation in natural communities. These diverse cropping systems encourage biological management of herbivores, weeds and diseases and therefore require a knowledge of trophic interactions and models of pathogenesis. Sustainable agroecosystems will then reflect patterns of succession, energy flow and nutrient cycling similar to natural ecosystems. | ![]() |
The
Land Institute ![]() |
Ecology and the agricultural sciences: A false dichotomy?
Paul and Robertson
Agroecology is a discipline that provides concepts and principles based on organism-level interactions that can be used to design resource-efficient agricultural systems.
Success of the new discipline could depend on learning from the mistakes of IPM.
Defining sustainable systems must incorporate information from the social sciences.
A perspective on agroecosystem science.
Elliot and Cole
Agroecology is the study of optimization of whole systems across several levels of scale in space and time. This study must employ models to understand the complexity of the systems.
| Ecology = the relationship between organisms and their environment |
Levels of Organization in Biology
|
Ecosystem
= a functional system of complementary relations between living organisms and their environment, delimited by arbitrarily chosen boundaries, which in space and time appear to maintain a steady yet dynamic equilibrium.Agroecosystem = a site of agricultural production –a farm. Defining the farm as an ecosystem allows analysis of the food production system as a whole, including the complex set of inputs and outputs and the interconnections of component parts.
Ecosystems have structure and function:
Structural components:
Functional components = processes that link the structural components and therefore define the interactions among factors
Structural Properties of Communities:
|
1. Species richness (total number of species):
Scale dependence
Alpha (a ), Beta (b ) and Gamma (g ) diversity
Intercropping Strip cropping Monoculture
![]()
The scale for Alpha diversity is selected to identify processes between individual organisms (e.g. competition for resources required for growth in shared resource pools) that determine the degree of diversity and the maintenance of diversity.
The scale for Beta diversity is selected to identify yet another set of processes that operate between populations or patches (metapopulations) to determine degree of diversity and maintenance of diversity. An example of this would be the process of seed dispersal for each of the species in a community. Plant species with low dispersal would tend to be more patchy. This may best pertain to weeds in agroecosystems.
In an agroecosystem diversity can be managed by planting crops in different patterns and changes of crops over time.
Soybeans grown with a smother crop of mustard.
![]()
![]()
Gamma diversity = landscape variability and yet another set of processes like climate and soil parent material factors determining the variation in species number over broad areas or regions.
![]()
![]()
Diversity indices take relative abundance into account
(refer to the description from your "M" field trip assignment)
- horizontal
- vertical
![]()
Do food webs exist in agroecosystems?
How might food webs be different in agroecosystems than in more natural "undisturbed" ecosystems?
Agroecosystems tend to decrease the organisms in food webs which decreases the number of links which in turn may decrease the number of mechanisms that regulate population growth. In a way, this deregulation is done intentionally in agriculture so that the crop can grow unregulated. Unfortunately, pests also respond to the lack of regulation and their populations grow unregulated. It is also quite likely that many of the microorganisms (decomposers and consumers) under high frequency soil disturbance in agroecosystems, become deregulated. Those organisms that can take advantage of the agricultural inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) and high frequency disturbance prosper at the expense of others.
So...the question becomes...Can we recreate enough of a food web in an agroecosystem to provide maximum regulation without a major impact on crop production?
Important information that we must have:
- Are all linkages in the food web equal? Are some more important for system regulation?
Keystone species has a narrow and more broad (modern) definition.
Narrow defn. = a species that preferentially consumes and thus holds in check (regulates) another species that would otherwise dominate the system (Paine, 1969).
Broad defn. = a species whose impact on its community or ecosystem is large, and disproportionately large relative to its abundance (Power et al., 1996).
- How will we know when we have enough food web structure to accomplish our goal of a maximum of natural regulation?
Demonstration of concept with a wild oat study:
[See wild oat seed bank graphs]
Bioindicators = multiple measures of organism health in the presence of environmental stressors which include several levels of biological organization and time scales of response.
Stability = decreased risk for producer (especially if system is monoculture)
Can a system be too stable?
Crop mimicry in weeds...


Application of Agroecology
Dimensions of ecological diversity in ecosystems (Gliessman, 1998)
| Dimension | Description |
| Species | Number of different species in the system |
| Genetic | Degree of variability of genetic information in the system (with each species and among different species) |
| Vertical | Number of distinct horizontal layers in the system |
| Horizontal | Pattern of spatial distribution of organisms in the system |
| Structural | Number of locations (niches, trophic roles) in the system organization |
| Functional | Complexity of interaction, energy flow, and material cycling among system components |
| Temporal | Degree of heterogeneity of cyclical changes (daily, seasonal, etc.) in the system |
Functioning of Ecosystems:
- Carbon cycle
- Nitrogen cycle
- Water
- Oxygen
- Phosphorous
- Sulfur
- Micronutrients
- Competition (intra- and inter-specific)
- Mutualism
- Succession
- Dynamic equilibrium
Natural Ecosystems vs Agroecosystems
Structural and Functional Differences Between Natural and Agroecosystems (adapted from Odum, 1969)
|
Natural Ecosystems |
Agroecosystems |
|
|
Net productivity |
Medium |
High |
|
Trophic interactions |
Complex |
Simple |
|
Species diversity |
High |
Low |
|
Genetic diversity |
High |
Low |
|
Nutrient cycles |
Closed |
Open |
|
Stability (resilience) |
High |
Low |
|
Human control |
Independent |
Dependent |
|
Temporal permanence |
Long |
Short |
|
Habitat heterogeneity |
Complex |
Simple |
Methods of Increasing Ecological Diversity in an Agroecosystem (adapted from Gliessman, 1998)
Dimension of ecological diversity affected:
| Method | Species | Genetic | Vertical | Horizontal | Structural | Functional | Temporal |
| Intercropping | |||||||
| Strip cropping | |||||||
| Hedgerows & buffers | |||||||
| Cover-cropping | |||||||
| Rotations | |||||||
| Fallows | |||||||
| Minimum tillage | |||||||
| High inputs of organic matter | |||||||
| Reduction of chemical use |
| Direct or primary effect | |
| Indirect, secondary, or potential effect | |
| Little or no effect |





